The tests for 0~120km/hr sprint [0~100km/hr inclusive] were carried out at the same place, about the same time but on different dates on different fuels - RON97 vs RON95. Let the graphics speaks for itself. [click on the image to enlarge]My earlier tests on fuel consumptions and performance also seemed that there was no advantage of using RON97 over RON95 on Peugeot 308 Turbo!
Nevertheless I will perform 400m and 1000m standing tests running on RON97 to compare with the test results running on RON95. Im very skeptical if there will be any significant improvement though.
Ill be switching back to RON95 because Im quite happy with its performance and fuel economy [for my308] unless, otherwise somebody comes up with authentic figures to proof that RON97 is better than RON95 in terms of performance and fuel consumptions [based on controlled or similar condition].
Better in terms of performance and fuel consumptions from Buttdyno test results for Peugeot 308THP running on RON97 vs RON95 found in forums are too good to be true.
|Home|Fuel Consumption|Performance|uncles DIY|Car Size Comparison|
.png)
0 comments:
Post a Comment